The efficacy of the regimens of “graft versus host” disease prophylaxis after hematopoietic stem cell transplantation from unrelated donors in children: single center experience
- Authors: Sidorova N.V.1, Slinin A.S.1,2, Machneva E.B.1,3, Konstantinova V.V.1,3, Burya A.E.3, Pristanskova E.A.3, lagonravova O.L.3, Skorobogatovа E.V.3, Kirgizov K.I.1
-
Affiliations:
- N.N. Blokhin National Medical Research Center of Oncology, Ministry of Healthcare of Russian Federation
- Dmitry Rogachev National Medical Research Center of Pediatric Hematology, Oncology, Immunology Ministry of Healthcare of Russian Federation
- Russian Children’s Clinical Hospital of the N.I. Pirogov Russian National Research Medical University, Ministry of Healthcare of Russian Federation
- Issue: Vol 19, No 2 (2020)
- Pages: 71-82
- Section: ORIGINAL ARTICLES
- Submitted: 01.07.2020
- Accepted: 01.07.2020
- Published: 01.07.2020
- URL: https://hemoncim.com/jour/article/view/341
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.24287/1726-1708-2020-19-2-71-82
- ID: 341
Cite item
Full Text
Abstract
Graft versus host” disease (GvHD) is one of the most frequent and severe complications of allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT). The optimal model of GvHD prophylaxis in allo-HSCT from alternative donors in children currently remains actual question. Materials and methods. The study was approved by the Independent Ethics Committee and the Scientific Council of the N.N. Blokhin National Medical Research Center of Oncology, Ministry of Healthcare of Russian Federation. Two hundred fifty six allo-HSCT were made during the period 2003–2019 from matched unrelated donors (MUD). Age median was 7.1 years old. The source of hematopoietic stem cells (HSCs) bone marrow – 76% (n = 194), peripheral blood stem cells – 24% (n = 62). GvHD prophylaxis included: tacrolimus (Tacro), cyclosporin A (CsA), methotrexate (Mtx), mycophenolate mofetil (MMF), in following combinations Tacro/Mtx (n = 98), Tacro/MMF (n = 102), tacro/Mtx + MMF (n = 3), CsA/Mtx (n = 24), CsA/Mtx + MMF (n = 12), CsA + MMF (n = 14). Median follow-up 8.9 years. GvHD prophylaxis regimen did not affect significantly the toxicity of therapy (toxicity: severe mucositis grade III–IV, nephrotoxicity, hepatotoxicity) (p = 0.4; p = 0.24; p = 0.62 respectively). In our study the rate of the overall survival (ОS) has significant differences in depending of the source of prevention GvHD. The using a combination of tacrolimus and cyclosporine with low doses of methotrexate had a positive effect on OS (p = 0.035) in patients of common non-malignant and malignant groups, as well as on the level of 2-year relapse-free survival in the group of children with malignant disorders (p = 0.671). In the general group the OS the worst results were achieved when MMF was included in the prophylaxis model. In this experience of treating of a large cohort of patients the choice of calcineurin inhibitors and methotrexate as the agent GvHD prophylaxis showed the efficacy and safety for non-manipulated MUD for both malignant and non-malignant diseases in children.
About the authors
N. V. Sidorova
N.N. Blokhin National Medical Research Center of Oncology, Ministry of Healthcare of Russian Federation
Author for correspondence.
Email: valerevna25@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0003-3797-5808
Head of the Department of Pediatric Bone Marrow and Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation,
Russia, 115478, Moscow, Kashirskoe Shosse, 23
Russian FederationA. S. Slinin
N.N. Blokhin National Medical Research Center of Oncology, Ministry of Healthcare of Russian Federation; Dmitry Rogachev National Medical Research Center of Pediatric Hematology, Oncology, Immunology Ministry of Healthcare of Russian Federation
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-2021-0465
Russian Federation
E. B. Machneva
N.N. Blokhin National Medical Research Center of Oncology, Ministry of Healthcare of Russian Federation; Russian Children’s Clinical Hospital of the N.I. Pirogov Russian National Research Medical University, Ministry of Healthcare of Russian Federation
ORCID iD: 0000-0003-2395-4045
Russian Federation
V. V. Konstantinova
N.N. Blokhin National Medical Research Center of Oncology, Ministry of Healthcare of Russian Federation; Russian Children’s Clinical Hospital of the N.I. Pirogov Russian National Research Medical University, Ministry of Healthcare of Russian Federation
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-2652-8642
Russian Federation
A. E. Burya
Russian Children’s Clinical Hospital of the N.I. Pirogov Russian National Research Medical University, Ministry of Healthcare of Russian Federation
ORCID iD: 0000-0003-4170-7152
Russian Federation
E. A. Pristanskova
Russian Children’s Clinical Hospital of the N.I. Pirogov Russian National Research Medical University, Ministry of Healthcare of Russian Federation
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-4569-657X
Russian Federation
O. L. lagonravova
Russian Children’s Clinical Hospital of the N.I. Pirogov Russian National Research Medical University, Ministry of Healthcare of Russian Federation
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-1587-3256
Russian Federation
E. V. Skorobogatovа
Russian Children’s Clinical Hospital of the N.I. Pirogov Russian National Research Medical University, Ministry of Healthcare of Russian Federation
ORCID iD: 0000-0003-4431-1444
Russian Federation
K. I. Kirgizov
N.N. Blokhin National Medical Research Center of Oncology, Ministry of Healthcare of Russian Federation
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-2945-284X
Russian Federation
References
Supplementary files
