Biological reconstruction: the use of a fibular flap in the treatment of diaphyseal defects in pediatric patients with malignant bone tumors
- Authors: Bolshakov N.A.1, Artemov A.Y.1, Vorochay A.M.1, Slinin A.S.1, Tikhonova M.V.1, Rybchenok V.V.2, Alexandrov A.V.3, Grachev N.S.1
-
Affiliations:
- The Dmitry Rogachev National Medical Research Center of Pediatric Hematology, Oncology and Immunology of Ministry of Healthcare of the Russian Federation
- Research Institute of Clinical Surgery of the N.I. Pirogov Russian National Research Medical University of Ministry of Healthcare of the Russian Federation
- The N.F. Filatov Children's City Clinical Hospital of the Department of Health of Moscow
- Issue: Vol 23, No 3 (2024)
- Pages: 36-43
- Section: ORIGINAL ARTICLES
- Submitted: 13.10.2024
- Accepted: 13.10.2024
- Published: 08.07.2025
- URL: https://hemoncim.com/jour/article/view/895
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.24287/1726-1708-2024-23-3-36-43
- ID: 895
Cite item
Full Text
Abstract
The use of vascularized fibula flaps for the reconstruction of diaphyseal defects after resection of malignant bone tumors has a long history and has proved to be an effective method. A unique advantage of this technique is that instead of massive titanium endoprosthesis the patient's own bone is used for repair. Between September 2013 and September 2021, reconstruction using a vascularized fibula flap was performed in 32 patients admitted to the Department of Oncology and Pediatric Surgery of the Dmitry Rogachev National Medical Research Center of Pediatric Hematology, Oncology and Immunology of Ministry of Healthcare of the Russian Federation. The median follow-up was 3.2 years. Complications were analyzed according to the Henderson classification. Despite a high rate of complications (37.5%), excellent and good functional results were achieved in 87.5% cases. To evaluate the functional outcomes after surgical treatment, we used the international MusculoSkeletal Tumor Society Score (MSTS). It is important to note that after this type of surgery, there are no restrictions in walking (in terms of distance) and practicing sports activities that are usually not recommended after endoprosthetic reconstruction, such as doing barbell leg exercises, skiing, running, and rock climbing. The study was approved by the Independent Ethics Committee and Scientific Council of the Dmitry Rogachev National Medical Research Center of Pediatric Hematology, Oncology and Immunology of Ministry of Healthcare of the Russian Federation.
About the authors
N. A. Bolshakov
The Dmitry Rogachev National Medical Research Center of Pediatric Hematology, Oncology and Immunology of Ministry of Healthcare of the Russian Federation
Author for correspondence.
Email: bolshakovn@yandex.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0001-6313-6712
Nikolay A. Bolshakov - an orthopaedic traumatologist, Head of the Department of Oncology and Pediatric Surgery.
1 Samory Mashela St., Moscow 117997
Russian FederationA. Yu. Artemov
The Dmitry Rogachev National Medical Research Center of Pediatric Hematology, Oncology and Immunology of Ministry of Healthcare of the Russian Federation
ORCID iD: 0000-0003-2210-6431
Moscow
Russian FederationA. M. Vorochay
The Dmitry Rogachev National Medical Research Center of Pediatric Hematology, Oncology and Immunology of Ministry of Healthcare of the Russian Federation
ORCID iD: 0000-0001-8026-0977
Moscow
Russian FederationA. S. Slinin
The Dmitry Rogachev National Medical Research Center of Pediatric Hematology, Oncology and Immunology of Ministry of Healthcare of the Russian Federation
Moscow
Russian FederationM. V. Tikhonova
The Dmitry Rogachev National Medical Research Center of Pediatric Hematology, Oncology and Immunology of Ministry of Healthcare of the Russian Federation
ORCID iD: 0000-0001-5679-8961
Moscow
Russian FederationV. V. Rybchenok
Research Institute of Clinical Surgery of the N.I. Pirogov Russian National Research Medical University of Ministry of Healthcare of the Russian Federation
ORCID iD: 0000-0001-9635-891X
Moscow
Russian FederationA. V. Alexandrov
The N.F. Filatov Children's City Clinical Hospital of the Department of Health of Moscow
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-6110-2380
Moscow
Russian FederationN. S. Grachev
The Dmitry Rogachev National Medical Research Center of Pediatric Hematology, Oncology and Immunology of Ministry of Healthcare of the Russian Federation
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-4451-3233
Moscow
Russian FederationReferences
- Ferrari A., Dirksen U., Bielack S. Sarcomas of Soft Tissue and Bone. Prog Tumor Res 2016; 43: 128–41.
- Biazzo A., De Paolis M. Multidisciplinary approach to osteosarcoma. Acta Orthop Belg 2016; 82 (4): 690–8.
- Harwood J.L., Alexander J.H., Mayerson J.L., Scharschmidt T.J. Targeted Chemotherapy in Bone and Soft-Tissue Sarcoma. Orthop Clin North Am 2015; 46 (4): 587–608.
- Lesensky J., Prince D.E. Distraction osteogenesis reconstruction of large segmental bone defects after primary tumor resection: pitfalls and benefits. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol 2017; 27 (6): 715–27.
- Errani C., Ceruso M., Donati D.M., Manfrini M. Microsurgical reconstruction with vascularized fibula and massive bone allograft for bone tumors. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol 2019; 29 (2): 307–11.
- Puri A. Limb salvage: When, where, and how? Indian J Orthop 2015; 49 (1): 46–55.
- Bolshakov N.A., Artemov A.Yu., Vorochai A.M., Khamin I.G., Tikhonova M.V., Slinin А.S., et al. Endoprosthesis reconstruction, as a surgical treatment of children and adolescence with bone tumors around the knee. Pediatric Hematology/Oncology and Immunopathology 2019; 18 (1): 55–61. (In Russ.) doi: 10.24287/17261708-2019-18-1-55-61
- Casali P.G., Bielack S., Abecassis N., Aro H.T., Bauer S., Biagini R., et al. Bone sarcomas: ESMO-PaedCan-EURACAN Clinical Practice Guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up. Ann Oncol 2018; 29: iv79–95.
- Jeys L., Abudu A., Grimer R. Expandable prostheses. Oper Tech Orthop Surg Oncol 2014: 46–54.
- Hahn E. Eine Methode, Pseudarthrosen mit großem Defekt zur Ausheilung zu bringen. Zentralblatt Chir 1884; 21: 337–41.
- Walter M. Resection De L’extremite Inferieure Du Radius Pour Osteosarcome: Greffe de L’extremité Supériuie Du Péroné. Bull Et Mem Soc de Chir de Par 1911; 37: 739–47.
- Zaretski A., Amir A., Meller I., Leshem D., Kollender Y., Barnea Y. Free fibula long bone reconstruction in orthopedic oncology: A surgical algorithm for reconstructive options. Plast Reconstr Surg 2004; 113 (7): 1989–2000.
- Groundland J.S., Binitie O. Reconstruction After Tumor Resection in the Growing Child. Orthop Clin North Am 2016; 47 (1): 265–81.
- Muscolo D.L., Ayerza M.A., Aponte-Tinao L., Farfalli G. Allograft reconstruction after sarcoma resection in children younger than 10 years old. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2008; 466 (8): 1856–62.
- Davis A.M., Wright J.G., Williams J.I., Bombardier C., Griffin A., Bell R.S. Development of a measure of physical function for patients with bone and soft tissue sarcoma. Qual Life Res 1996; 5 (5): 508–16.
- Henderson E.R., O'Connor M.I., Ruggieri P., Windhager R., Funovics P.T., Gibbons C.L. Classification of failure of limb salvage after reconstructive surgery for bone tumours: A modified system including biological and expandable reconstructions. Bone Joint J 2014; 96-B (11): 1436–40.
- Kaatsch P., Strothotte J., Becker C., Bielack S., Dirksen U., Blettner M. Pediatric bone tumors in Germany from 1987 to 2011: incidence rates, time trends and survival. Acta Oncol (Madr) 2016; 55 (9–10): 1145–51.
- Gatta G., Botta L., Rossi S., Aareleid T., Bielska-Lasota M., Clavel J. Childhood cancer survival in Europe 1999–2007: Results of EURO-CARE-5-a population-based study. Lancet Oncol 2014; 15 (1): 35–47.
- Gaspar N., Hawkins D.S., Dirksen U., Lewis I.J., Ferrari S., Le Deley M.-C. Ewing sarcoma: Current management and future approaches through collaboration. J Clin Oncol 2015; 33 (27): 3036–46.
- Esiashvili N., Goodman M., Marcus R.B. Changes in Incidence and Survival of Ewing Sarcoma Patients Over the Past 3 Decades. J Pediatr Hematol Oncol 2008; 30 (6): 425–30.
- Capanna R., Campanacci D.A., Belot N., Beltrami G., Manfrini M., Innocenti M. A New Reconstructive Technique for Intercalary Defects of Long Bones: The Association of Massive Allograft with Vascularized Fibular Autograft. LongTerm Results and Comparison with Alternative Techniques. Orthop Clin North Am 2007; 38 (1): 51–60.
- Houdek M.T., Wagner E.R., Stans A.A., Shin A.Y., Bishop A.T., Sim F.H. What Is the Outcome of Allograft and Intramedullary Free Fibula (Capanna Technique) in Pediatric and Adolescent Patients With Bone Tumors? Clin Orthop Relat Res 2016; 474 (3): 660–8.
- Bus M.P.A., Dijkstra P.D.S., van de Sande M.A.J., Taminiau A.H.M., Schreuder H.W.B., Jutte P.C. Intercalary allograft reconstructions following resection of primary bone tumors: A nationwide multicenter study. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2014; 96 (4): е26.
- Panagopoulos G.N., Mavrogenis A.F., Mauffrey C., Lesenský J., Angelini A., Megaloikonomos P.D. Intercalary reconstructions after bone tumor resections: a review of treatments. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol 2017; 27 (6): 737–46.
- Andreou D., Bielack S.S., Carrle D., Kevric M., Kotz R., Winkelmann W. The influence of tumorand treatment-related factors on the development of local recurrence in osteosarcoma after adequate surgery. An analysis of 1355 patients treated on neoadjuvant Cooperative Osteosarcoma Study Group protocols. Ann Oncol 2011; 22 (5): 1228–35.
Supplementary files
