The role of epigenetic therapy in the treatment of childhood acute myeloid leukemia

Cover Page
  • Authors: Popa A.V.1,2,3, Tiganova O.A.2,4, Sokova O.I.5, Subbotina N.N.1, Olshanskaya Y.V.6, Kurdyukov B.V.1,7, Serebryakova I.N.5, Palladina A.D.8, Tupitsyn N.N.8, Mentkevich G.L.1
  • Affiliations:
    1. Research Institute of Pediatric Oncology and Hematology, the N.N. Blokhin National Medical Research Center of Oncology of Ministry of Healthcare of the Russian Federation
    2. The N.I. Pirogov Russian National Research Medical University of Ministry of Healthcare of the Russian Federation
    3. The Dmitry Rogachev National Medical Research Center of Pediatric Hematology, Oncology and Immunology of Ministry of Healthcare of the Russian Federation
    4. The Morozov Children's City Clinical Hospital of the Department of Health of Moscow
    5. Research Institute of Carcinogenesis, the N.N. Blokhin National Medical Research Center of Oncology of Ministry of Healthcare of the Russian Federation
    6. The Dmitry Rogachev National Medical Research Center of Pediatric Hematology, Oncology and Immunology of Ministry of Healthcare of the Russian Federation
    7. The V.F. Voyno-Yasenetsky Scientific and Practical Center of Specialized Medical Care for Children of the Department of Health of Moscow
    8. Research Institute of Clinical Oncology, the N.N. Blokhin National Medical Research Center of Oncology of Ministry of Healthcare of the Russian Federation
  • Issue: Vol 24, No 1 (2025)
  • Pages: 39-49
  • Section: ORIGINAL ARTICLES
  • Submitted: 21.11.2024
  • Accepted: 14.01.2025
  • Published: 08.07.2025
  • URL: https://hemoncim.com/jour/article/view/915
  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.24287/1726-1708-2025-24-1-39-49
  • ID: 915

Cite item

Full Text

Abstract

The treatment results of children with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) still remain unsatisfactory. The standard chemotherapy allows achieving complete remission in 91–96% of patients, but the event-free (EFS) and overall (OS) survival rates are still not high enough, the main cause of treatment failure in children with AML is relapse of the disease. DNA methylation and histone modification are major epigenetic changes in AML, leading to silencing of tumor suppressor genes. Research of the epigenetic control of gene expression in AML through histone modification and DNA demethylation promotes better understanding of the biology of blasts.

The aim of our study: to prove the effectiveness of the NII DOG AML 2012 protocol based on the combination of standard chemotherapy and epigenetic therapy. The study was approved by the Independent Ethics Committee and the Scientific Council of the N.N. Blokhin NMRC of Oncology of Ministry of Healthcare of the Russian Federation. From 01.01.2013 to 31.05.2019, the following patients were enrolled in the study: 35 patients who were receiving treatment according to the NII DOG AML 2012 protocol and 52 patients who were receiving treatment according to the AML-BFM 2004 protocol. Between two groups, there was no significant difference in sex, age, and distribution by risk groups. The high-risk and intermediate-risk patients received 5 courses of chemotherapy (AIE, HAM, AI, hAM, HAE) and the standard-risk patients received 4 courses of chemotherapy (AIE, AI, hAM, HAE). Epigenetic therapy according to the NII DOG AML 2012 protocol consisted of valproic acid (weeks 1–78), all-trans-retinoic acid (days 1–43 and then days 1–14 of each subsequent chemotherapy course) and decitabine 20 mg/m2 which was given within a therapeutic window in 5 patients and 26 patients received it on days 16–20 from the beginning of treatment. Six patients received 5-azacitidine instead of decitabine. There was no toxicity in 5 patients who received decitabine within a therapeutic window: one patient developed relapse (13 months) and one patient died of severe infection after induction therapy on day 17, three patients are still alive in complete remission (67, 70, and 72 months), with two of them having received haploidentical hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. All the patients who received decitabine on days 16–20 achieved complete remission after induction therapy (2 patients of them did not respond to AIE treatment and achieved remission only after decitabine treatment). Among the patients who were treated with chemotherapy only, complete remission was achieved in 82.6% (p = 0.04). In the patients treated according to the NII DOG AML 2012 protocol, the 5-year EFS and OS was 69.1 ± 9.8%, and 73.5 ± 9.4%, respectively, vs 54.0 ± 7.3% (p = 0.2) and 69.2 ± 6.4% (p = 0.58) in the patients treated with chemotherapy only. The five-year EFS and cumulative incidence of relapse (CIR) of the high-risk patients treated according to the NII DOG AML 2012 and AML-BFM 2004 protocol were 77.8 ± 13.4% vs 50.0 ± 8.6% (p = 0.044) and 15.2 ± 10% vs 42.5 ± 9.2% (p = 0.056), respectively. None of the patients treated according to the NII DOG AML 2012 protocol underwent allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) during the first remission. After excluding from the analysis 6 patients who received allogeneic HSCT during the first remission and were treated according to the AML-BFM 2004 protocol, the EFS and CIR rates of the high-risk patients were 46.4 ± 9.4% (p = 0.02) and 47.4 ± 9.5% (p = 0.029), respectively. All the six patients who received 5-azacitidine instead of decitabine died (one patient died during induction therapy and 5 patients died of AML progression) and further study of this arm of the protocol was closed. Thus, the addition of epigenetic therapy to standard chemotherapy in pediatric patients with AML reduced the CIR, increased the number of complete remissions and the overall survival compared with the patients treated with chemotherapy only. The high-risk patients treated according to the NII DOG AML 2012 protocol achieved higher EFS and lower CIR rates compared with the patients who received no demethylating agents and underwent no allogeneic HSCT. Probably, epigenetic therapy may allow patients to avoid allogeneic HSCT during the first complete remission. According to our study results, decitabine has shown to be more effective than 5-azacitidine. Decitabine should be given after the first course of induction therapy during the period of aplasia.

About the authors

A. V. Popa

Research Institute of Pediatric Oncology and Hematology, the N.N. Blokhin National Medical Research Center of Oncology of Ministry of Healthcare of the Russian Federation; The N.I. Pirogov Russian National Research Medical University of Ministry of Healthcare of the Russian Federation; The Dmitry Rogachev National Medical Research Center of Pediatric Hematology, Oncology and Immunology of Ministry of Healthcare
of the Russian Federation

Author for correspondence.
Email: al.popa66@gmail.com
ORCID iD: 0000-0001-5318-8033
SPIN-code: 1709-1467

Alexander V. Popa - Dr. Med. Sci., Professor of the RAS, Head of the Department of Epidemiology and Late Effects in Pediatric Cancer Survivors.

1 Samory Mashela St., 117997, Moscow

Russian Federation

O. A. Tiganova

The N.I. Pirogov Russian National Research Medical University of Ministry of Healthcare of the Russian Federation; The Morozov Children's City Clinical Hospital of the Department of Health of Moscow

Email: svudy@yandex.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-7833-935X

Moscow

Russian Federation

O. I. Sokova

Research Institute of Carcinogenesis, the N.N. Blokhin National Medical Research Center of Oncology of Ministry of Healthcare of the Russian Federation

Email: flrsok@yandex.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0001-7159-5302

Moscow

Russian Federation

N. N. Subbotina

Research Institute of Pediatric Oncology and Hematology, the N.N. Blokhin National Medical Research Center of Oncology of Ministry of Healthcare of the Russian Federation

Email: natik-23@yandex.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-1766-9726

Moscow

Russian Federation

Yu. V. Olshanskaya

The Dmitry Rogachev National Medical Research Center of Pediatric Hematology, Oncology and Immunology of Ministry of Healthcare of the Russian Federation

Email: yuliaolshanskaya@gmail.com
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-2352-7716

Moscow

Russian Federation

B. V. Kurdyukov

Research Institute of Pediatric Oncology and Hematology, the N.N. Blokhin National Medical Research Center of Oncology of Ministry of Healthcare of the Russian Federation; The V.F. Voyno-Yasenetsky Scientific and Practical Center of Specialized Medical Care for Children of the Department of Health of Moscow

Email: b.kurdiukov@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0003-1896-0926

Moscow

Russian Federation

I. N. Serebryakova

Research Institute of Carcinogenesis, the N.N. Blokhin National Medical Research Center of Oncology of Ministry of Healthcare of the Russian Federation

Email: ins_ronc@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-8389-4737

Moscow

Russian Federation

A. D. Palladina

Research Institute of Clinical Oncology, the N.N. Blokhin National Medical Research Center of Oncology of Ministry of Healthcare of the Russian Federation

Email: palladinaa@gmail.com
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-9400-7347

Moscow

Russian Federation

N. N. Tupitsyn

Research Institute of Clinical Oncology, the N.N. Blokhin National Medical Research Center of Oncology of Ministry of Healthcare of the Russian Federation

Email: nntca@yahoo.com
ORCID iD: 0000-0003-3966-128X

Moscow

Russian Federation

G. L. Mentkevich

Research Institute of Pediatric Oncology and Hematology, the N.N. Blokhin National Medical Research Center of Oncology of Ministry of Healthcare of the Russian Federation

Email: g.mentkevich@yandex.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0003-0879-0791

Moscow

Russian Federation

References

  1. Swerdlow S.H., Campo E., Harris N.L., Jaffe E.S., Pileri S.A., Stein H., Thiele J. (eds.). WHO Classification of Tumours of Haematopoietic and Lymphoid Tissues. Revised 4th Edition. Lyon. IARC Press; 2017.
  2. Balgobind B.V., Hollink I.H., Arentsen-Peters S.T., Zimmermann M., Harbott J., Berna Beverloo H., et al. Integrative analysis of type-I and type-II aberrations underscores the genetic heterogeneity of pediatric acute myeloid leukemia. Haematologica 2011; 96 (10): 1478–87. doi: 10.3324/haematol.2010.038976
  3. Jasmijn D.E., de Rooij C., Zwaan M., van den Heuvel-Eibrink M. Pediatric AML: From Biology to Clinical Management. J Clin Med 2015; 4 (1): 127–49. DOI: org/10.3390/jcm4010127
  4. Valerio D.G., Katsman-Kuipers J.E., Jansen J.H., Verboon L.J., de Haas V., Stary J., et al. Mapping epigenetic regulator gene mutations in cytogenetically normal pediatric acute myeloid leukemia. Haematologica 2014; 99 (8): e130–2. doi: 10.3324/haematol.2013.094565
  5. Creutzig U., Zimmermann M., Bourquin J.P., Dworzak M.N., Fleisch- hack G., Graf N., et al. Randomized trial comparing liposomal daunorubicin with idarubicin as induction for pediatric acute myeloid leukemia: Results from Study AML-BFM 2004. Blood 2013; 122: 37–43. doi: 10.1182/blood-2013-02-484097
  6. Cooper T.M., Franklin J., Gerbing R.B., Alonzo T.A., Hurwitz C., Raimondi S.C., et al. AAML03P1, a pilot study of the safety of gemtuzumab ozogamicin in combination with chemotherapy for newly diagnosed childhood acute myeloid leukemia: A report from the Children’s Oncology Group. Cancer 2011; 118 (3): 761–9. doi: 10.1002/cncr.26190
  7. Gibson B.E., Webb D.K., How- man A.J., De Graaf S.S.N., Harri- son C.J., Wheatley K.; United Kingdom Childhood Leukaemia Working Group and the Dutch Childhood Oncology Group. Results of a randomized trial in children with Acute Myeloid Leukaemia: Medical research council AML12 trial. Br J Haematol 2011; 155: 366–76. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2141.2011.08851.x
  8. Popa A.V., Gorohova E.V., Fleyshman E.V., Sokova O.I., Serebryakova I.N., Nemirovchenko V.S., et al. Epigenetic therapy is an important component in treating children with acute myeloid leukemia. Clinical Oncohematology 2011; 4 (1): 20–6. (In Russ.).
  9. Nemirovchenko N.V. The role of valproic acid and all-trans-retinoic acid in the treatment of children with acute myeloid leukemia. Dissert. PhD. M.; 2014. (In Russ.).
  10. Khwaja A., Bjorkholm M., Gale R.E., Levine R.L., Jordan C.T., Ehninger G., et al. Acute Myeloid Leukemia. Nat Rev Dis Primes 2016; 2: 16010. DOI: org/10.1038/nrdp.2016.10
  11. di Masi A., Leboffe L., De Marinis E., Pagano F., Cicconi L., Rochette-Egly C., et al. Retinoic Acid Receptors: from molecular mechanisms to cancer therapy. Mol Aspects Med 2015; 41: 1–115. DOI: org/10.1016/j.mam.2014.12.003
  12. Zardo G., Cimino G., Nervi C. Epigenetic plasticity of chromatin in embryonic and hematopoietic stem/progenitor cells: therapeutic potential of cell reprogramming. Leukemia 2008; 22: 1503–18. doi: 10.1038/leu.2008.141
  13. Ferguson L.R., Tathman A.L., Lin Z., Denny W.A. Epigenetic regulation of gene expression as an anticancer drug target. Curr Cancer Drug Targets 2011; 11: 199–212. doi: 10.2174/156800911794328510
  14. Moore A.S., Kearns P.R., Knapper S., Pearson A.D.J., Zwaan C.M. Novel therapies for children with acute myeloid leukaemia. Leukemia 2013; 27 (7): 1451–60. doi: 10.1038/leu.2013.106
  15. De The H. Differentiation therapy revisited. Nat Rev Cancer 2018; 18: 117–27. doi: 10.1038/nrc.2017.103
  16. Meshinchi S., Alonzo T.A., Stirewalt D.L., Zwaan M., Zimmerman M., Reinhardt D., et al. Clinical implications of FLT3 mutations in pediatric AML. Blood 2006; 108 (12): 3654–61. doi: 10.1182/blood-200603-009233
  17. Sallmyr A., Fan J., Datta K.,Kim K.-T., Grosu D., Shapiro P., et al. Internal tandem duplication of FLT3 (FLT3/ITD) induces increased ROS production, DNA damage, and misrepair: implications for poor prognosis in AML. Blood 2008; 111 (6): 3173–82. doi: 10.1182/blood-200705-092510
  18. Gu T.L., Nardone J., Wang Y., Loriaux M., Villén J., Beausoleil S., et al. Survey of activated FLT3 signaling in leukemia. PLoS One 2011; 6 (4): e19169. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0019169
  19. Greenblatt S.M., Nimmer S.D. Chromatin modifiers and the promise of epigenetic therapy in acute leukemia. Leukemia 2014; 28: 1396–406. doi: 10.1038/leu.2014.94
  20. Schenk T., Chen W.C., Göllner S., Howell L., Jin L., Hebestreit K., et al. Inhibition of the LSD1 (KDM1A) demethylase reactivates the alltrans-retinoic acid differentiation pathway in acute myeloid leukemia. Nat Med 2012; 18: 605–11. doi: 10.1038/nm.2661
  21. Pollard J.A., Chang B.H., Cooper T.M.,Gross T., Gupta S., Ho P.A., et al. Sorafenib treatment following hematopoietic stem cell transplant in pediatric FLT3/ITD+ AML. Blood 2013; 122 (21): 3969. doi: 10.1182/blood.V122.21.3969.3969
  22. Trus M.R., Yang L., Saiz F.S., Bordeleau L., Jurisica I., Minden M.D. The histone deacetylase inhibitor valproic acid alters sensitivity towards all trans retinoic acid in acute myeloblastic leukemia cells. Leukemia 2005; 19: 1161–8. doi: 10.1038/sj.leu.2403773
  23. Alcalay M., Meani N., Gelmetti V., Fantozzi A., Fagioli M., Orleth A., et al. Acute myeloid Leukemia fusion proteins deregulate genes involved in stem cell maintenance and DNA repair. J Clin Ivest 2003; 112: 1751– 61. doi: 10.1172/JCI17595
  24. Billinger L., Rücker F.G., Kurz S.,Du J., Scholl C., Sander S., et al. Gene expression profiling identifies distinct subclasses or core binding factor acute myeloid leukemia. Blood 2007; 110: 1291–300. doi: 10.1182/blood-2006-10-049783
  25. Krajci O., Wunderlich M., Geiger H., Chou F.-S., Schleimer D., Jansen M., et al. P53 signaling in response to increased DNA damage sensitizes AML1-ETO cells to stress-induced death. Blood 2008; 111: 2190–9. doi: 10.1182/blood2007-06-093682
  26. Esposito M.T., So C.W. DNA damage accumulation and repair defects in acute myeloid leukemia: implications for pathogenesis, disease progression and chemotherapy resistance. Chromosoma 2014; 123: 545–61. doi: 10.1007/s00412-0140482-9
  27. Popp H.D., Naumann N., Brendel S.,Henzler T., Weiss C., Hofmann W.-K., Fabarius A. Increase of DNA damage and alteration of the DNA damage response in myelodisplastic syndromes and acute myeloid leukemias. Leuk Res 2017; 57: 112–8. doi: 10.1016/j.leukres.2017.03.011
  28. Voisset E., Moravsik E., Strat- ford E.W., Jaye A., Palgrave C.J., Hills R.K., et al. PML nuclear body disruption cooperates in APL pathogenesis and impairs DNA damage repair pathways in mice. Blood 2018; 131: 636–48. doi: 10.1016/j.leukres.2017.03.011
  29. Nagaria P., Robert C., Rassool F.V. DNA double-strand break response in stem cells: mechanisms to maintain genomic integry. Biochim Biophys Acta 2013; 1830: 2345–53. doi: 10.1016/j.leukres.2017.03.011
  30. Saintos M.A., Faryabi R.B., Ergen A.V., Day A.M., Malhowski A., Canela A., et al. DNA-damage-induced differentiation of leukemic cells as an anti-cancer barrier. Nature 2014; 514: 107–11. doi: 10.1038/nature13483

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML

Copyright (c) 2025 Popa A.V., Tiganova O.A., Sokova O.I., Subbotina N.N., Olshanskaya Y.V., Kurdyukov B.V., Serebryakova I.N., Palladina A.D., Tupitsyn N.N., Mentkevich G.L.

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.